I Just Don’t Know
I don’t think you will hear other analysts stay this, and it is rare that I will say this, but there are times that the smaller degree structure is a mystery to me. There are times where I just don’t know how the smaller degree structure will take shape. And, this is one of those times. Before I explain in a bit more depth, I want to re-post what I wrote before I took my leave last week:
“As I have explained many times before, as we were expecting the market to top out and begin a 4th wave pullback in the first quarter of 2022, the market topped out 60 points shy of the target we set for the rally from the 4270SPX region. My minimum target region for this 4th wave pullback was the 4440SPX region, which I outline for you well before this pullback began, and was the reason I suggested members to raise cash near the highs.
But, when we zoom out to focus upon the larger degree Fibonacci Pinball structure off the March 2020 lows presented on the daily chart, we have a few factors to consider.
Wave  of [iii] will usually target the 1.00-1.236 extensions of waves [i] and [ii] off the March 2020 low, and that is where the market topped at the end of last year. We also know that wave  of [iii] will usually revisit the .618-.764 extension region of waves [i] and [ii], which is what I have defined as our Major Market Pivot. Thus far, the market has held that pivot on this pullback.
But, these are the issues the market has presented us with which has not allowed greater clarity off the recent lows.
First, when we get a c-wave decline, that c-wave takes shape as a clear 5-wave structure the great majority of the time. In this instance, we really only completed 3-waves down into our recent low. This would provide us with a more unorthodox w-x-y structure, which is a less common bottoming structure. Now, even though I did say it is “normally” a less common structure, I have been noting that each pullback we have seen since the March 2020 low has completed with such an unorthodox structure. So, is this one going to present the same way? This has been one of the issues with which we have been dealing.
Second, to add to the complication, when a wave  completes, the market then rallies off the low in a clear 5-wave structure to signal that the next bullish phase has begun. In our instance, the rally off the lows has counted best as an overlapping structure, which is not striking standard Fibonacci Pinball ratios off those lows. This most often suggests that the rally is corrective in nature, and for these two reasons, we have been presenting the corrective counts as our primary view.
Should the market provide us with a higher high in the coming days, then there is potential that the low has indeed been struck at the recent lows, and this rally is taking shape as a leading diagonal for wave 1 of  of [iii]. Again, this is not the most ideal count for the two reasons cited above, nor is it normally a highly reliable structure. But, I think we would have to make the bullish count our primary count at the time since we are still in a bull market with our next ideal target in the 5500SPX region, as I have said many times, and surprises usually come to the upside in bull markets.
If we get a higher high, what would change my mind with regard to the more immediate bullish count?
Well, once we do complete wave 1 of  of [iii], then I can calculate a wave 2 pullback level which would project us up towards the 5500SPX region. However, if that level does not hold as support on the next pullback AND the break down below that level counts as a clear 5-wave structure, then I will likely be forced to adopt the bigger a-b-c structure presented in yellow on the 60-minute chart and look for at least a re-test of the recent lows back towards the bottom of our Major Market Pivot.
Now, for those that have been following my work closely, you would know that my normal trading/investing plan has me buying my first tranche of longs once the market is completing what I believe to be the wave iii of the c-wave. I do this to begin to layer into a bottoming structure that I believe we are creating, as it is not always certain that we will be seeing that 5th wave lower low. Therefore, I noted in our trading room that I was deploying some of the money I raised near the market highs as we were striking the lows in the 4222SPX region.
I usually leave the remaining amount of cash that I raised to buy the 5th wave lower low. But, when we do not get that 5th wave lower low, I will usually deploy the rest of that cash in one or two additional tranches. Either I will deploy the remaining cash at the wave 2 pullback, or I will split it between the wave 2 pullback and the wave ii of 3 pullback after we complete wave i of wave 3. I do the latter layering in when the initial 5-wave structure off the low is unclear. So, that will likely be my course of action in this case if we see a higher high. The reason I do so is to still leave some cash available for the potential of a lower low when there still remains questions about the structure.
I think this is also a good time for everyone to recognize just how sentiment works, and why having a plan laid out well before you need to effectuate it is so important. At the lows, when I normally begin layering into long positions, many were questioning me as to how wise that really is as it “looked” to many that the market was certainly heading much lower. In fact, many were telling me that were going to see the 3000’s in the market again, at which I chuckled.
And, now, many are beginning to fear they missed their opportunity to go long. But, the market will usually provide you with several opportunities to prepare for the rally we expect to the 5500SPX region. So, making a plan and maintaining that plan is quite crucial to success in buying low and selling high, especially when your emotions would be driving you to do the exact opposite. That is why we use our Fibonacci Pinball method of Elliott Wave analysis to provide us market context to allow us to create those plans.
At the end of the day, I wish the market gave us a much clearer wave structure upon which we can rely to be more certain that wave  was over and that wave  has indeed begun so that we can more confidently deploy the cash we raised near the highs. Unfortunately, that is not what we have been provided. But, I wanted you to at least understand the reasons this region has been providing us the uncertainty with which we have been outlining since the low has indeed been struck, and my plans going forward.”
Now, I want to modify the analysis from what I presented last weekend based upon the action since. I want to begin with my view that I think it to be a lesser probability that wave  has actually ended. Therefore, the leading diagonal scenario has been taken off my chart, as I think it is a much lower probability at this point in time. Of course, it may resurrect in the coming weeks. But, for now, I am leaning towards the potential of a lower low in wave  as being the higher probability. And, the path there is that of which I am currently uncertain, as there are two potential paths to that lower low – green (primary) and yellow (alternative).
As I have noted, we are dealing with movements in 3-wave structures. And, when we began this type of action, it provided me early warning to the potential whipsaw environment that I was expecting. That has not changed.
If you zoom into the 5-minute ES chart, you will see we have two potential paths for going higher in the coming days. (Of course, the pre-supposes we do not break down below this week’s low, which would then open the door to a more direct and immediate drop to a lower low in wave ).
The primary green count views today’s rally as the a-wave, within a [b] wave, within the wave v of the ending diagonal c-wave of wave . Yes, I know that is a mouthful, but you may be able to see it more clearly on the 60-minute SPX chart. Just keep in mind that while standard impulsive waves take shape as 5-wave substructures, diagonals subdivide into 3-wave structures, all of which count as [a][b][c]. Again, the 60-minute SPX chart may make this a bit clearer.
The alternative count in yellow will take us back up towards the 4700SPX region, and will likely extend this correction out into the March/April time-frame, as it would mean we are still only in the b-wave of wave , still needing to begin a c-wave “crash-like” decline to complete wave .
Until I see evidence to the contrary, I am still maintaining the green count as my primary, as I have for weeks now. And, once we begin the next rally after the b/2 pullback outlined on the 5-minute ES chart, we will set our parameters to define the difference between the green and yellow counts. Until then, I am unsure which one will play out, but I am maintaining the green count as my primary for now.
Lastly, I want to again reiterate that main primary target over the next year or so remains in the 5500SPX region for all the reasons I have outlined over the last year. Nothing has changed in that perspective. So, for now, we are simply allowing the market to complete wave  – or at least provide us with a better confirmation that it has already ended – before we begin looking aggressively to 5500SPX.